• Home
  • About
  • Center for Theology
  • Standards

The Writers' Block

The Community blog for the Writers of the All Saints' Center for Theology

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Standards

The views expressed on The Writers’ Block do not necessarily express
the views of the ASCT editorial team, the All Saints’ community, or the
New England diocese. They express the views of the individual author
alone. However, the editorial team has asked each author to adhere to
the standards listed below:

The goal of the Center for Theology is to serve the spiritual formation of the church while providing a public witness to the world. In order to achieve these objectives, we ask all contributors to conform their writing to a set of spiritual standards.

The primary criteria for contributions to the Center for Theology are to ensure all material is biblical, orthodox, and beneficial to the church.

  1. A contribution is “biblical” when it conforms to the plain sense of scripture. While there will always be disagreements over the various nuances of the Bible, we wish to avoid overly speculative exegesis that stretches the original meaning of the biblical text past its breaking point. Speculative hermeneutics has its place within Biblical interpretation, but since the Center for Theology is designed to build up the church and provide a public witness to the faith, speculation is discouraged.
  2. A contribution is “orthodox” when it does not contradict the affirmations of the Nicene Creed or the conclusions of the first seven ecumenical councils.  At the same time, we affirm the historical and incarnational character of theology, believing that theology is contextual.  Contributors to All Saints’ Center for Theology will work to develop submissions that build upon these foundations of the faith, not establishing “new doctrines” but working to write orthodox theology within our own context.
  3. A contribution is “beneficial to the church” when it focuses on encouraging, teaching, and building up God’s people. Generally, overly critical pieces are discouraged.  Criticism is  acceptable so long as it is coupled with constructive advice to the church. Deconstructive criticism of the church will not be allowed. It may be helpful to imagine yourself presenting your contribution to in a Sunday morning educational ministry (such as a Sunday School or confirmation class). If you would be uncomfortable presenting a piece to the church, then it most likely is not appropriate for inclusion in the Center for Theology. Also, take into consideration that the Center is a ministry serving the high school/college educated person who comes to church regularly, wants to know more about the faith, and desires tools to develop their spirituality.

Additional criteria:

  • Avoid engaging the Culture Wars. While the ministry will likely address hot topics within the Culture Wars (e.g. homosexual marriage), please remember that the objective is to build up the church and provide a public witness. The goal is not to sway the broad American culture in one direction or the other, whatever the merits. Rather, our context is within the New England branch of the Anglican Church in North America. So, for example, it would not be advisable to submit a contribution debunking the constitutionality of Roe v. Wade; however, a contribution discussing how the church can serve a pregnant woman who is exploring the option of abortion would be acceptable.
  • Consider the New England context of the ministry. While we accept submissions from writers all over the world, our organizational center and “heart” resides in New England. Therefore, we are not trying to present a representative global Christianity. This means many contributions will be limited to authors living and working within New England churches.
  • Remember we are a ministry, rather than a profit-motivated magazine, organization, or corporation. We are serving the church’s needs, not ourselves.
  • Remember that the methodological principle underlying the spirit of the Center is to capture the theological work of New England Anglicans as it develops within our ministry contexts. This principle can be applied to something as simple as reflecting on a few ideas you had while listening to a sermon or an observation you made while interacting with people in your church. The idea is to think theologically within the church context and capture it on the site.
  • Remember that the Center is not attempting to develop a confessional or official theology for ACNA.
  • Stick with what you know, rather than what you think you know.  The Center is trying to capture theology as it is lived within the church, rather than the university or the library, so focus on the ways in which the truth of orthodox doctrine is expressed in the church.
Advertisement

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 90 other subscribers
  • Blogroll

    • All Saints' Center for Theology
    • Care for the Flock
    • Adam David Rick
    • KaitDugan
    • allsaintswritersblock
    • almathis
    • andenemae
    • Brenda Grover
    • Christine Sherratt
    • Douglas Cooke Dobbins
    • Fr. Brian Barry
    • James Arcadi
    • jhillebert
    • John Pryor
    • Fr. Brench
    • Megan's Musings
  • Archives

    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Twitter Updates

    • Don't believe anybody who support #TransEnterix! It is their troll's army! #SEC #fraud 4 years ago
    • @shrut19 @TransEnterix They are dangerous just for their investors) They don'n sell anything) They try just specula… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • @OnPurposeBouti2 @TransEnterix There is no news from @TransEnterix. It is strange. 4 years ago
    • @LaurieR33 @Tagadoor I don't understand why top managers of #TransEnterix don't make any afforts to cope with the problem? 4 years ago
    • I don't understand why top managers of #TransEnterix don't make any afforts to cope with the problem? twitter.com/LaurieR33/stat… 4 years ago
    Follow @astheology

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • The Writers' Block
    • Join 90 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Writers' Block
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: