Archive for April, 2012

The Good Shepherd

O God, whose Son Jesus is the good shepherd of your people; Grant that when we hear his voice we may know him who calls us each by name, and follow where he leads; who, with you and the Holy Spirit, lives and reigns, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.



Read Full Post »

Fr. James Martin answers the question “Why stay in church?

Philip Reed reviews Alasdair MacIntyre’s latest book, “God, Philosophy, Universities: A Selective History of the Catholic Philosophical Tradition.”

The blog Catholicity and Covenant offers some constructive criticism of the ecclesiology implicit in Eliud Wabakala’s opening address at the GAFCON leadership conference in London.

James R. Rogers examines the theological themes of self-sacrifice in the book “The Hunger Games.”



Read Full Post »

Last Sunday and this Sunday (Easter Sundays II & III), the Eucharistic lections from Acts dip us into a very neat sequence of events that transpired in the first weeks of the Church, giving us some helpful models of what it means to be a witness of Christ.  I thought it’d be fun to make a conglomeration of my sermons from these two Sundays into one little summary article.

Acts 3:1-11 ~ the Initial Encounter

Peter & John are off to the Temple to pray the 3:00 Office (a Jewish precursor to the Christian daily office), and they come across a crippled beggar at the gate who asks them for money.  They don’t have any, but offer him healing in the name of Jesus, at which point the man leaps up and causes quite the scene with rejoicing.  People notice, people ask questions, and Peter & John are the center of attention.

Acts 3:12-26 ~ Peter’s First Speech

(I didn’t analyze the entire speech, just through verse 20, so forgive me if you were hoping for more commentary than I’ll offer here.)

v12-13a: Peter explains what they’d done, and emphasize that they didn’t perform the miraculous healing themselves, but God had done it in order to glorify the name of Jesus.  This is just one example in the Bible of this fact, reminding us that the entire ministry of the Church – our spiritual gifts, our entire lives – must be done for God’s glory also.  We cannot claim any credit nor seek fame; we live for Christ.

v13b: Peter explains who Jesus is – the guy that his audience had gotten executed roughly two months ago.  In particular, he reminds them that Pilate was going to let Jesus go free, had they not insisted.  As Jesus had said to Pilate, “they are guilty of the greater sin.”

v14: What’s worse, they even preferred receiving Barabbus back instead of Jesus.  They literally disowned God, since Jesus was the King of the Jews, and they instead proclaimed “we have no king but Caesar!”

v15: But Jesus did not just die, he was also resurrected, and Peter makes a point of identifying himself (and the other apostles) as eye-witnesses.  Now, we are not first-hand witnesses of the resurrection, and the non-believers in our midst are not the original crowd who pushed to get Jesus executed, but we have received the eye-witness account of the resurrection (and indeed the entire gospel message), and the sins of the whole word are what ultimately nailed Christ to the cross, so we can still learn from these verses: we cannot escape the reality of our sinful human nature.

v16: Peter describes the man’s healing as having been accomplished through Jesus’ Name with faith in Him.  It’s tempting to take this as some sort of magic formula – there have been Christians, churches, and even whole denominations that misapply this verse to make the heretical claim that “if you’re not healed, you don’t have enough faith!”  The formula-like description of this verse must be read in balance with verse 13a: all miracles are done to glorify Christ.  We cannot manipulate and control the Holy Spirit.  We can, however, be open and receptive to the ministry He wants to carry out in us and through us, including miraculous healings.

v17: The Jews had Jesus killed “in their ignorance.”  Ignorance does not excuse sin, but it does highlight the very real possibility of change.  Peter will get to this in verse 19.

v18: First, Peter shows why they should not have been ignorant: the entire Hebrew Bible (our Old Testament) foretells the entire gospel of Christ!  This assertion is also supported by Jesus in Luke 24:26-7 and 24:45-47.

v19-20: This where Peter offers them a chance to escape their ignorance.  Repentance toward God yields the wiping out of sin, which yields refreshment from God.  Peter’s witness of Christ (explaining the miracle and sharing what he knows about Jesus) led straight into preaching the gospel.  Now, witnessing and preaching are two different things, but what Peter does here is run the two together in a neat fashion.

Acts 4:1-7 ~The First Response

The Priests then have Peter and John arrested, because they don’t approve of all this Jesus nonsense.  The next day, they assemble a group of respected Jewish teachers, Priests, the High Priests, and such, and bring Peter & John in for questioning.

Acts 4:8-12 ~ Peter’s Second Speech

v9-10: Peter basically just repeats what he said before – healing is a miracle wrought by God for the glory of Christ Jesus.

v11-12: Peter now repeats (and summarizes) the gospel message he’d proclaimed before.  If anything, it’s even more intense than before, because he quotes Psalm 118:22 (in verse 11) and emphasizes that salvation is in Christ alone.

It’s important for us to notice that after being arrested for witnessing & preaching, Peter did not back off in the message he proclaimed.  The truth of Christ is more important than our comfort, our safety, or even our lives.  When our witness to the gospel faces backlash (be it mockery, social stigma, or actual persecution), we need to have the integrity to stick to our guns and not compromise.  (Of course, there’s nothing wrong with re-evaluating how we present our witness to the world.  Peter, afterall, did address the two crowds differently.)

Acts 4:13-18 ~ The Second Response

The Sanhedrin (the Jewish court) is far from convinced by Peter’s testimony.  However, they recognize that what Peter’s talking about has gotten the crowds really excited, and they cannot deny the reality of the miraculous healing.  So the best they can do is ask Peter and John to shut up and stop talking about that Jesus guy.

This is an interesting response, probably the most like what we get in our current culture.  It’s neither overwhelmingly positive (winning over the religious elite of the culture), nor overwhelmingly negative (getting Peter & John martyred), but rather it’s in between (a restraining order).  Our society pushes us to be quiet about our faith, in the name of religious peace and tolerance.  How we might handle that is modeled by Peter in the next few verses.

Acts 4:19-22 ~ Peter’s Closing Words

Who do we obey, human authority or God?  How can we not share what we know about our Creator, our King, our Savior?  We need to acknowledge openly “what we have seen and heard.”  For sure, this will look very different according to the situation.  In some places and professions it is practically illegal to display our faith openly, such as for school teachers.  This begs the question, do we need words to be witnesses to the gospel?  Eventually, yes, for Jesus is the Word of God, but our very lives can be silent witnesses too.  There’s a time for “go out into all the world and preach the gospel,” and a time for simply saying “come and see.”

Read Full Post »

Grant to me, O Lord, to know what I ought to know, to love what I ought to love, to praise what delights thee most, to value what is precious in thy sight, to hate what is offensive to Thee.  Do not suffer me to judge according to the sight of my eyes, nor to pass sentence according to the hearing of the ears of ignorant men; but to discern with true judgment between things visible and spiritual, and above all things to inquire what is the good pleasure of thy will.



Read Full Post »

The journal Faith & Leadership provides a Q&A with Lauren Winner on her new memoir “Still: Notes on a Mid-Faith Crisis,” where she explains how the spiritual life is not always defined by ecstasy.

Professor Brandon Withrow discusses Jonathan Edwards, the Holy Spirit, and Evolution over at Patheos.

Relevant magazine answers the question: What is Sexual Holiness?


Read Full Post »

On some calendars, today is the feast day of St. Mellitus (died 624), first Bishop of London and third Archbishop of Canterbury. Mellitus was one of the missionaries that assisted St. Augustine of Canterbury (not of Hippo) with the re-evangelization of Britain.

One small thing that Mellitus is important for is for being the recipient of a letter from Pope Gregory the Great regarding the interaction between Christianity and the paganism Mellitus so often confronted in his mission. Below is the text of this brief letter, perhaps it might be of some instruction for us today as we think about engaging in a similar project.

“To his most beloved son, the Abbot Mellitus; Gregory, the servant of the servants of God. We have been much concerned, since the departure of our congregation that is with you, because we have received no account of the success of your journey. When, therefore, Almighty God shall bring you to the most reverend Bishop Augustine, our brother, tell him what I have upon mature deliberation on the affair of the English, determined upon, viz. that the temples of the idols in that nation ought not to be destroyed; but let the idols that are in them be destroyed; let holy water be made and sprinkled in the said temples, let altars be erected, and relics placed. For if those temples are well built, it is requisite that they be converted from the worship of devils to the service of the true God; that the nation, seeing that their temples are not destroyed, may remove error from their hearts, and knowing and adoring the true God, may the more familiarly resort to the places to which they have been accustomed. And because they have been used to slaughter many oxen in the sacrifices to devils, some solemnity must be exchanged for them on this account, as that on the day of the dedication, or the nativities of the holy martyrs, whose relics are there deposited, they may build themselves huts of the boughs of trees, about those churches which have been turned to that use from temples, and celebrate the solemnity with religious feasting, and no more offer beasts to the Devil, but kill cattle to the praise of God in their eating, and return thanks to the Giver of all things for their sustenance; to the end that, whilst some gratifications are outwardly permitted them, they may the more easily consent to the inward consolations of the grace of God. For there is no doubt that it is impossible to efface every thing at once from their obdurate minds; because he who endeavours to ascend to the highest place, rises by degrees or steps, and not by leaps. Thus the Lord made himself known to the people of Israel in Egypt; and yet he allowed them the use of the sacrifices which they were wont to offer to the Devil, in his own worship; so as to command them in his sacrifice to kill beasts, to the end that, changing their hearts, they might lay aside one part of the sacrifice, whilst they retained another; that whilst they offered the same beasts which they were wont to offer, they should offer them to God, and not to idols; and thus they would no longer be the same sacrifices. This it behoves your affection to communicate to our aforesaid brother, that he being there present, may consider how he is to order all things. God preserve you in safety, most beloved son.”

Read Full Post »

An Easter Prayer

O God, who for our redemption gave you only begotten Son to the death of the Cross, and by his glorious resurrection delivered us from the power of the enemy: Grant us so to die daily to sin, that we may evermore live with him in the joy of his resurrection; through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.


Read Full Post »

Kenyan Archbishop Eliud Wabukala’s keynote address at the GAFCON conference in London has been made available online, where he talks about the need for Anglican structures centered around confessional statements and the necessity of robust theological work.

Nicole Greenfield analyzes all the sex-talk going on in hipster and wannabe hipster churches around America and wonders whether their shock tactics to engage the young will be effective.

Mark Misulia discusses the philosophical and theological implications of Jesse Bering’s book “The Belief Instinct” on theism in general — in short, Bering proposes that human beings are disposed to discern order, purpose, and justice in the world.

William Doino explains how the contemporary Catholic church is still debating the ecumenical conference Vatican II and what it means for the mission of the church.

Read Full Post »

Breathe in me, O Holy Spirit, that my thoughts may all be holy.
Act in me, O Holy Spirit, that my work, too, may be holy.
Draw my heart, O Holy Spirit, that I love but what is holy.
Strengthen me, O Holy Spirit, to defend all that is holy.
Guard me, then, O Holy Spirit, that I always may be holy.


~ St. Augustine of Hippo



Read Full Post »

Evangelical leader Chuck Colson has died — Sarah Pulliam Bailey has the obituary. Brittany Smith notes, among other things, that Colson was “doing social justice before it was cool.”

Chris R. Armstrong discusses the importance of God’s absence to spiritual formation, arguing that the “dark night of the soul” can be appreciated as a spiritual discipline, as observed through the lives of Mother Theresa, C.S. Lewis, and Martin Luther.

The New York Times reports on NYU professor John Sexton’s class “Baseball as a Road to God.”

Pew Research Center has released a study showing that college-aged Millennials are abandoning the church — and Christianity — in droves.



Read Full Post »

Older Posts »